Sunday, October 11, 2026

A Nilotic Priest's Complaint

 

The Ipuwer Papyrus dated to c. 1250 B.C., the height of the Egyptian Empire.

Papyrus Leiden I 344 recto, also known as The Admonitions of Ipuwer, is the complaint of an Egyptian priest about the loss of central authority as Egypt extended its political influence far beyond the Nile Valley. This was a time of syncretism when the old religion of the Nilotic Hebrew priests was subsumed in order to sustain an empire of multiple deities. 

The papyrus describes a time of chaos in contrast to a former age of peace and prosperity when Re (Father God) and Horus/HR (Re's Son) were the principal deities for the people of the Nile Valley. It is a political treatise and an ethical lesson about the loss of governmental authority, social reversals, and anarchy expressed in the desecration of sacred sites and royal tombs. Slaves turned against their masters. Robbers achieved wealth and status. The stabilizing influence of the Nilotic priests was denigrated. 

Some have attempted to link Ipuwer's description of rivers of blood, darkness, and social upheaval to the Ten Plagues of Exodus. However, the timeline and literary conventions of the text do not support a direct connection to the Exodus narrative.

The Nile water looking like blood relates to the fact that the Nilotic priests mixed red ochre powder and barley with the water to make it look like blood (See James B. Pritchard's The Ancient Near East, Vol. I, page 4). This "blood water" was ritually consumed in their "communion" with Re, whose solar rays gave light, sustained life, and helped to purify the Hebrew priests of the Nile.


Friday, September 18, 2026

The European Union and Ethical Standards

 



Corruption scandals in Europe led to the creation of an official body of the European Union. Impetus for the establishment of the Interinstitutional Ethics Body (IBES) came after a cash-for-influence investigation involving European Union officials accused of taking bribes from Qatar, Morocco, and Mauritania.

Eight major EU institutions and bodies signed an inter-institutional agreement in May 2024 following momentum from prior corruption scandals. Participating Institutions include the European Parliament, European Commission, Council of the EU, Court of Justice, European Central Bank, and others.

The landmark EU ethics body was to create common minimum ethical standards across its major institutions. It establishes shared, minimum ethical guidelines and transparency rules for politicians and political appointees within EU institutions such as the European Parliament and European Commission. However, it has no authority to investigate corruption. Each member state is responsible for monitoring and policing ethics violations within their own countries.

The Interinstitutional Body for Ethical Standards has had limited effectiveness since its agreement in 2024 due to institutional compromises, a lack of investigative powers, and political delays in funding and implementation. The IBES has been criticized for lack of transparency because it relies of self-coordination and is without independent oversight.



Thursday, August 27, 2026

Eiseley on Individual Moral Responsibility

 



For Loren Eiseley individual moral responsibility is the foundation of human survival and ethical dignity and can never be replaced by collective or institutional mandates. He warned his readers about the dangers of a silenced individual conscience.

Loren Eiseley told the truth when he argued that state-sponsored collectivism seeks to replace the individual conscience. He wrote, "I believe in Christ in all who defend the individual from the iron boot of the expanding collective state." 

In his 1960 book The Firmament of Time Eiseley argued that collectivist ethics can never replace individual moral responsibility.

The warning should be sounded about all movements that seek to shape people's moral conscience, be they on the left or the right.  

Related reading: 8 Great Passages From Loren Eiseley's "The Firmament Of Time"; Remembering Loren Corey Eiseley


Thursday, May 28, 2026

On the Churching of Women



An Orthodox priest presents an infant before the icons of Christ and the Theotokos.

Dr. Alice C. Linsley

The fact that some Anglicans have never heard the term "churching" of women suggests that they are not aware of the significance of blood in the Bible, and specifically about the blood work of women.

The "churching" tradition was lost in the wave of prayer book revisions. It was obfuscated by feminists who saw the early tradition of a new mother remaining home for 40 days, then coming to the church for a rite of purification and blessing, as misogynistic.

The eastern churches have preserved the custom. After 40 days of being sequestered with the newborn, the mother comes to the church. She is met at the door where the priest offers a rite of purification and blessing. The mother remains standing there while the priest takes the infant to the front of the church and presents the child before the icons of Christ and the Virgin Mary. If the child is a female, she is then carried back to the mother who joins the congregation. If the child is male, the priest carries him into the altar sanctum and walks him around the altar. This rite acknowledges the blood work of females and clarifies that it is distinct from the bloodwork of male priests at the altar. Consider the deep significance of that gender distinction.

The traditional rite is about more than giving thanks for the safe delivery of a child. The 40 days before returning to church is symbolic, and good for the woman and infant. The sequester is patterned on the symbolism of the number 40 in the Bible. The Virgin Mary took Jesus to the Temple 40 days after his birth. Angels ministered to Jesus after his 40 days in the wilderness. Liturgy that is rich in symbolism connected to Scripture should not be so easily eliminated or dismissed.

Blood when shed in any form has significance in the Bible. After being involved in combat the priest-king Melchizedek ministered to Abraham with bread and wine. This was a rite of blood cleansing as was common in the ancient world. Our unbreakable bond as Christians is that of kinship formed through Christ's blood. St. Paul refers to the blood of Jesus no less than twelve times in his writings. Because God makes peace with us through the blood of Christ, the Apostle urges us to, "Take every care to preserve the unity of the Spirit by the peace that binds you together" (Eph. 4:3).

Blood speaks of the distinctions between male and female and between life and death. For the early Hebrew, the blood work of males and the blood work of females was distinct. The blood work of females pertains to the monthly cycle and childbirth. The blood work of males pertains to war, hunting, execution, and animal sacrifice by the priests. Men preparing to hunt or go to war sequestered themselves from menstruating women. That also was true of the priests when it was their time to serve at the Temple. Women in childbirth sequestered themselves from men. The distinction between the two types of blood work speaks of life and death. The two are never to be confused or mixed. Men were never allowed in the birthing chambers and women were never allowed in the place of animal sacrifice.

The traditional churching of women addresses blood. It involves priestly prayer for purification. Antinomian Anglicans neglect what the Bible reveals about our accountability to the Creator for all blood that is shed. Balanced acknowledgement of the "blood work" of males and females is biblical. That anthropological observation is confirmed by a detailed study of the canonical Scriptures which themselves reveal acute gender balance. I have written on this extensively as an Anglican.

By reducing the rite to a service of thanksgiving, the newer prayer books lost the connection to the biblical understanding of blood as having power before our Creator. That takes us back to Genesis where we read that Abel’s blood cried to God from the ground.

Related reading: A Christian Anthropologist Considers Gender in the Bible; Orthodoxy Requires Binary Reasoning; Is "Male Headship" a Biblical Doctrine?; Changing the Church by Stealth; Philosophers' Corner: Two Types of Binary Reasoning; Binary Reasoning Informs Christian Morality and Ethics

Friday, April 24, 2026

The Ethical Formation of Dietrich Bonhoeffer

 



Bonhoeffer traveled to New York City in the summer of 1930 to pursue further theological training, arriving in the U.S. as Hitler was beginning his rise to power in Germany. While at Union Theological Seminary, Bonhoeffer was mentored by Reinhold Niebuhr, regarded as the father of modern social ethics. Niebuhr’s influence on Bonhoeffer stimulated Bonhoeffer's thoughts on a more practical social engagement between the Church and the world. Bonhoeffer respected Niebuhr’s deep commitment to linking faith with practical social and political action.

Bonhoeffer's time in New York City exposed him to African American worship with spirituals and vigorous preaching styles. He became active at Harlem's Abyssinian Baptist Church where he taught Sunday School. Founded in 1808 to fight segregated seating, the church became a hub of social activism, civil rights, and community empowerment. Bonhoeffer's formation as a Lutheran pastor and activist clearly were shaped by his experiences at the historic church and Niebuhr's teaching and witness.

As a Lutheran Bonhoeffer advanced the "Two Kingdoms" (or two governances) theory of Martin Luther. He viewed the church and state as distinct "divine mandates," both subordinate to God but with separate roles: the state preserves earthly order through law, while the church proclaims the Gospel. Luther’s Two Kingdoms theory posits that God rules the world in two distinct ways: the spiritual kingdom (right hand) governs souls through the Gospel and grace, while the secular kingdom (left hand) restrains evil through law and the sword. Both are by God's authority but must be separate to prevent church interference in state politics and the state's interference with the Church's Gospel mission.

The best presentation of Bonhoeffer's view on State and Church can be found in his book Ethics, Section III. Here he articulates that true ethics involves taking active responsibility for others and engaging with reality rather than isolating oneself from the world's conflicts. He states that "whether or not government is aware of its own true basis, its task consists in maintaining by the power of the sword an outward justice in which life is preserved and is thus held open for Christ." He believed that "government serves Christ by its very existence." 




Ethics was unfinished before Bonhoeffer died. It was edited and published after his death by Eberhard Bethge in 1949. Simon and Schuster published the first Touchstone Edition in 1995 (cover shown above).

Beginning in 1935, Bonhoeffer helped to establish an underground seminary for the Confessing Church in Finkenwalde (now Szczecin, Poland). Before its closure by the Gestapo in 1937, the community focused on spiritual formation, communal living, and training pastors to confront Nazi ideology and defend Gospel truth. Bonhoeffer believed that a "new monasticism" was needed to renew the Church which had become a passive in the face of the rising Nazi power. He was especially critical of German Christians who permitted Hitler to be their conscience (Ethics, pp.139-140). The experiment at Finkenwald resulted in two of Bonhoeffer's most significant works, Discipleship and Life Together.

Bonhoeffer's role in the Nazi resistance and in a failed assassination attempt on Hitler cost his life. He was executed on April 9, 1945, a few months before the end of World War II. He was 39 years old.

Thursday, April 16, 2026

11 US Scientists Dead or Missing

 


Maj Gen (ret.) William Neil McCasland has been missing for several weeks 
(Image: Susan McCasland Wilkerson)

Nuno Loureiro (age 47) was the Director of the MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center. On December 15, 2025, he was fatally shot at his home in Brookline, Massachusetts. His death and the deaths and disappearances of at least 9 other US nuclear or high-tech scientists raise national security concerns.

Missing are retired Air Force Major General William Neil McCasland (age 68), a former commander of the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Anthony Chavez (age 79), a retired lab worker at the Air Force Research Lab, and Monica Reza, the Director of Materials Processing at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. On June 22, 2025, Reza waved at her hiking companion on a ridge in the Angeles National Forest and was never seen again. Also missing are Steven Garcia (Kansas City National Security Campus) and Melissa Casias (Los Alamos National Laboratory).

At the Air Force Research Laboratory, McCasland led billions of dollars in advanced materials sciences and future weapons research across one of the largest scientific centers in the Department of Defense.

Authorities previously told Newsweek they were aware of the speculation surrounding McCasland's case but had no verified information establishing any connection between his disappearance and any other missing person investigation.

Michael David Hicks, a research scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, died on July 30, 2023.

Frank Maiwald, a principal researcher at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory died on July 4, 2024. 

Carl Grillmair, a Caltech astrophysicist who worked on NASA’s NEOWISE and NEO Surveyor missions died February 16, 2026.


Sunday, April 12, 2026

Bryan Bedford's Conflict of Interest

 



Bryan Bedford, the administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, maintained a multimillion-dollar financial stake in an airline company his agency regulates for more than seven months after he took the top job, despite saying he’d fully divest within 90 days.

This week, Bedford disclosed the sale of $5 million to $26 million worth of airline stock in February, raising questions of whether he maintained a financial conflict of interest well into his tenure as FAA administrator and violated an ethics agreement he signed ahead of his confirmation.

Beford is the former longtime chief executive of Republic Airways Holdings, an aviation holding company that owns two airlines.

"This appears to be a serious matter,” Foundation for Aviation Safety Executive Director Ed Pierson said in a statement.

The foundation, he said, “expects FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford, and all government officials, to fully comply with the law and to avoid any potential financial conflicts of interest. Unethical and/or illegal behavior has no place in the aviation industry.”