Tuesday, March 25, 2025

Failure to Preserve Science Journals

 


Today online research can supplement field and lab research in multiple sciences, but a study suggests that some potentially important findings are no longer available because they have not been preserved.

The work of archiving and preserving science journals is time consuming and there is no uniformly applied process to preserve free downloadable journal articles. If the publisher ceases to exist, the journals may vanish. 

Eighty-four online-only, open-access (OA) journals in the sciences, and nearly 100 more in the social sciences and humanities, have disappeared from the internet over the past 20 years as publishers stopped maintaining them. The average duration of online access appears to have been about 10 years.

“The analysis demonstrates that research integrity and the scholarly record preservation … are at risk across all academic disciplines and geographical regions," says Andrea Marchitelli, managing editor of JLIS.it, the Italian Journal of Library, Archives, and Information Science.

The authors of the study are Mikael Laakso (Hanken School of Economics), Lisa Matthias (Free University of Berlin), and Najko Jahn (University of Göttingen). To determine the list of the 176 vanished journals, they did some digital detective work because clues about them are fragmentary. After the journals go dark their names no longer appear in bibliometric databases.

The authors defined a vanished journal as one that published at least one complete volume as immediate OA, and less than 50% of its content is now available for free online. Some of the content may be accessible as printed copies or in paywalled commercial services.

They used a historical archive of internet content, the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine, to determine when production ceased and when content disappeared from the internet (within 5 years for three-quarters of the journals). The journals had been based in 50 different countries. Most of the now dark journals published articles only in English.

The study found that only about one-third of the 14,068 journals indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals in 2019 ensure the long-term preservation of their content. Some commercial services offer it, and the Public Knowledge Project Preservation Network, does so for free.



Saturday, March 8, 2025

Two Kinds of Human Dignity

 

I recommend reading this paper by Dr. David Bradshaw, Philosophy professor at the University of Kentucky. "Making Human Rights Orthodox," International Conference on Post-Humanism and Artificial Intelligence, Athens, Greece, November 2024.

Dr. Bradshaw often speaks at Eastern Orthodox conferences and is an expert in early Greek theology. His book Aristotle East and West: Metaphysics and the Division of Christendom is fascinating and challenging (Cambridge U Press, 2004).

Bradshaw writes, "From an Orthodox standpoint, contemporary human rights discourse is problematic in two ways: many rights that are widely advocated are contrary to Orthodox moral teaching, and even those that are acceptable (such as, for example, the right to life) are often justified through faulty reasoning. Hence it is important to articulate a legitimately Orthodox framework for human rights.
 
The approach suggested here is based on a distinction between two kinds of human dignity: ‘mere’ human dignity, consisting in being accorded respect and appropriate treatment by others, and ‘true’ human dignity, consisting of possessing a pure conscience before God. These give rise to two distinct categories of human rights, which I refer to, respectively, as rights of non-abuse and rights of agency."

Tuesday, February 25, 2025

The Reality of Human Exceptionalism

 


Dr. Alice C. Linsley

Many social issues of the Western world hinge on decisive statements about humans. They touch on human dignity, human diversity, human rights, and human reproduction. We hear from "experts" in many fields, but rarely from anthropologists whose focus is humankind.

The British biologist Richard Dawkins has been outspoken on these issues. In a particularly flamboyant statement, he denigrated the dignity of the unborn human.

"With respect to those meanings of 'human' that are relevant to the morality of abortion, any fetus is less human than an adult pig." - Richard Dawkins' Tweet

Yet Dawkins acknowledges that humans are exceptional. He states: "As Darwin recognized, we humans are the first and only species able to escape the brutal force that created us, natural selection….We alone on earth have evolved to the point where we can…overthrow the tyranny of natural selection.” (Have Humans Outgrown Natural Selection?)

The Hebrew writers of Genesis believed that God created humans fully human from the beginning in a divine act at a moment in the distant past. There is no reason to reject this view since humans appeared suddenly on the earth about 4 million years ago, and though these were anatomically archaic, they were nonetheless, fully human. We have evidence that they walked upright, had human dentition, hunted and butchered, and controlled fire.

The discovery of a complete fourth metatarsal of A. afarensis at Hadar shows the deep, flat base and tarsal facets that "imply that its midfoot had no ape-like midtarsal break. These features show that the A. afarensis foot was functionally like that of modern humans." (Carol Ward, William H. Kimbel, Donald C. Johanson, Feb. 2011)

A. afarensis used polished bone tools, had communal meals, and controlled fire. Some of the earliest evidence of controlled use of fire by humans was found at Swartkrans in South Africa. Other sites that indicate fire use include Chesowanja near Lake Baringo, Koobi Fora and Olorgesailie in Kenya.

In 2011 researchers discovered jaw bones and teeth of four individuals in the Afar region of Ethiopia which date to between 3.3m and 3.5m years old. These archaic humans were alive at the same time as other groups of early humans. Clearly, there were more archaic humans living in Africa 3 million years ago than is generally recognized.

Jeremy DeSilva showed that Australopithecus lacked the large grasping toe typical of tree climbers, and its spine, pelvis, knees, and ankles were made for walking on two legs. DeSilva compared the ankle joint, the tibia and the talus fossils of human ancestors ("hominins") between 4.12 million to 1.53 million years old, he discovered that all of the ankle joints resembled those of modern humans rather than those of apes. Chimpanzees flex their ankles 45 degrees from normal resting position. This makes it possible for apes to climb trees with great ease. While walking, humans flex their ankles a maximum of 20 degrees. The human ankle bones are quite distinct from those of apes. (One Small Step for Man — Bostonia Summer 2010)

Muscle reconstruction provides further evidence that the Australopithecine walked as modern humans do.

From the perspective of anthropology, the deep time record of human activity is evident in the vast number of innovative objects made and used by humans. Here is a short list.


Deniers of Human Exceptionalism

Human exceptionalism proposes, on the basis of data, that humans are unique and superior to other animals. Deniers claim that the belief is dangerous because it can lead to unsustainable practices and environmental degradation. However, humans also undertake many productive measures to preserve their environments.

Deniers assert that belief in human exceptionalism can lead to forgetting how all living creatures are interdependent. However, humans protect and encourage pollinators such as bees and butterflies, and control invasive species. We create protected areas, practice sustainable land management, support conservation efforts, and encourage biodiversity.

Deniers claim that belief in human exceptionalism promotes exploitation of other living creatures. Yet humans are compassionate toward animals and seek to preserve them and their habitats. Humans came up with animal husbandry, veterinary medicine, and fund-raising projects to improve the lives of other creatures.

Humans organize for war, ritually bury their dead, and offer prayers. They venerate their ancestors, create shrines to their heroes, and develop political systems. 

To deny the reality of human exceptionalism is to deny facts. Anthropologists have observed many complex social structures among humans, our ability to laugh at ourselves, to create play, to reason using high logic, to negotiate and resolve conflicts, to deliberate moral and ethical questions, and to adapt fairly quickly to ever-changing conditions. 




Tuesday, February 11, 2025

Remembering Loren Corey Eiseley

 



"I believe in Christ in all who defend the individual from the iron boot of the expanding collective state." - Loren Corey Eiseley (1907-1977)

Loren Eiseley was an American anthropologist, educator, philosopher, and natural science writer, who taught and published books from the 1950s through the 1970s. He received many honorary degrees and was a fellow of multiple professional societies. He was an award-winning author and former Provost of the University of Pennsylvania.

Eiseley's first book, The Immense Journey, was about the history of humanity, and it appealed to a mass audience. It has sold over a million copies and has been published in at least 16 languages. The Immense Journey established him as a writer with the ability to combine science and humanity in a poetic way.

Dear reader, if today you have but a brief time to read, click on the link to Eiseley's essay The Flow of the River
 

Related reading: Loren Eiseley - Wikipedia; The Flow of the River PDF by Loren C. Eiseley


Saturday, November 23, 2024

Escaping the News Encourages Tyranny

 


Dr. Alice C. Linsley

The quote from British blogger, Steve Aitchson, seems to recommend escapism. That appears to be his personal path. Steven Aitchison spent years teaching social media growth to internet entrepreneurs. Then, he moved on to teaching how to invest in cryptocurrencies before pursuing fiction writing. He has written a number of books with the word "Witches" in the titles. The latest series is The Witches of Scotland available on Amazon.

It is the nature of journalism to report on disturbing events. Often those events have little to no impact on the lives of most people. If someone choses to dwell on real crimes, that is a matter of preference.

Were people to follow Aitchson's advice, we would become easy prey for tyrants. Tyrants must control the flow of information. They restrict access to news that implicates them or exposes their crimes.

Aitchson's attitude may reflect his views on the British media. However, a recent report on that country's leading news agency, the BBC, makes it clear that the British public generally trust that source. According to that report, the BBC journalism is "slightly less trusted by people who identify with the political right than by people in the centre and on the left." However, "it is still as trusted on the right as major conservative newspapers."

The situation in the USA is different. The major news sources represent opposing political leanings. This helps to polarize the nation. Some are so tired of the polemic that they escape by tuning out the media entirely. 

Why not try to find balance instead? Determine what you wish to know about and read what intelligent, well-informed people might say about it. Fast from the frivolous and the provocative, and from entertainment that poses as "news."

Read world news from a broad variety of online sources. I recommend these:








Rather than escape from the news, engage with news sources that provide different perspectives and remain a free thinker!


Thursday, October 24, 2024

Facial Recognition and Your Privacy




There is no anonymity in a world where the individual's face is catalogued using facial recognition technologies. Privacy is not guaranteed and is hard to define. In an 1890 Harvard Law Review article it is defined as "the right to be let alone." The authors of the article, Samuel D. Warren, Jr. and Louis D. Brandeis, wanted the right to privacy to be protected by law, along with those other enshrined rights.

"Concerns about facial recognition had been building for decades. And now the nebulous bogeyman had finally found its form: a small company with mysterious founders and an unfathomably large database. And none of the millions of people who made up that database had given their consent. Clearview AI represents our worst fears, but it also offers, at long last, the opportunity to confront them." - Kashmir Hill

Kashmir Hill's book Your Face Belongs to Us: The Secretive Startup Dismantling Your Privacy has been shortlisted for the 2024 Royal Society Trivedi Science Book Prize.

The other side of the conversation comes from Clearview AI which states that its mission "is protecting our families, making our communities more secure and strengthening our national security and defense. We help law enforcement and governments in disrupting and solving crime, while also providing financial institutions, transportation, and other commercial enterprises to verify identities, prevent financial fraud, and combat identity theft."

Clearview AI collected 30 billion images from social media platforms to share with law enforcement. A photo you may have on Facebook or Instagram is likely part of Clearview’s database, enabling potential tracking and identification without your knowledge or consent. At the present moment, Clearview AI has over 50 billion images.

Tuesday, August 27, 2024

A Change Coming for TEC?

 


Dr. Alice C. Linsley


It can be argued that the crisis of authority in the Anglican world is evident in the shift from the biblical understanding of divinely appointed clergy to a corporate model of business. Divine appointment took the form of a calling on the man's life to serve God in the Church. The "call" was to be confirmed by his home congregation, discerned by a diocesan committee, and tested through seminary training, liturgical studies, prayer, the moral quality of the candidate, and Ember Day communications with his bishop. 

The shift began well before the 77th General Convention of the Episcopal Church decision to restructure in July 2012. It began at the peak of the Episcopal Church's cultural influence in the 1950s. Episcopal Church bishops perceived of their body as an entity resembling the "Established Church" of the USA. Bishop Paul Hewitt notes in his book The Day-spring from on High that "The Episcopal Church was a de-facto state church until the 1960s." (p. 29)

The bishops worked hard to build a perception of prestige, and they took measures to secure it. The college of bishops resembled an elite club in which the members were expected to guard the club's reputation. 

This is one reason Bishop James Pike was never held accountable for his apostasy. Pike wrote that the Church was no longer relevant in an essay published in Look magazine in December 1960. He was a growing embarrassment to the bishops who were glad to see him depart the Episcopal Church in April 1969. His parting shot was to describe the Episcopal Church "a sick - even dying- institution."

As the Episcopal Church lost ground to the counter-cultural movements of the 1960s and 1970s, it sought to create and deliver a revision of itself that would capture the public's attention. This required a business model for strategic decision-making and business operations. The new model sought to make the headlines by claiming to be the first at every turn. The Episcopal Church would be the first church to have women priests. It would be the first to consecrate a woman bishop. (And even better if that first female bishop be an African American!) The Episcopal Church would be the first to have a female Archbishop in Katharine J. Schori. In 1977, Bishop Paul Moore (NY) ordained the lesbian Ellen Marie Barrett to the priesthood. She served as Integrity's first co-president along with the late gay activist Louie Crew. Not surprisingly, the Episcopal Church was the first to elevate a partnered homosexual to the episcopacy. All these made for dramatic, attention-getting headlines.

The trend-setting bishops launched innovation after innovation. The theological leanings of the trendy Episcopal Church included Process Theology, Liberation Theology, and Feminist Theology.

There would be a new prayer book. From the outset, it was recognized as a departure from all former Anglican Books of Common Prayer. The 1979 prayer book presents what Urban T. Holmes termed a "differentiated" theology. An Episcopal priest and theologian, Holmes understood that the liturgical revisions of the 1970s drew more on Process Theology and modern philosophy than on Scripture, Tradition, and the Church Fathers. In reference to the 1979 Prayer Book, he wrote, "It is evident that Episcopalians as a whole are not clear about what has happened. The renewal movement in the 1970s, apart from the liturgical renewal, often reflects a nostalgia for a classical theology which many theologians know has not been viable for almost 200 years. The 1979 Book of Common Prayer is a product of a corporate, differentiated theological mind, which is not totally congruent with many of the inherited formularies of the last few centuries. This reality must soon ‘come home to roost’ in one way or another."

In the final analysis, spiritual pride and ambition turned a Christian body into a prime marketing agency for all things culturally relevant. The veneer of Christianity has worn thin over the past decade, exposing a church that is disordered and diseased.

Presiding Bishop Michael Curry's suggestion is to make The Episcopal Church the Anglican version of the 1960s Jesus Movement. He said, "Our work is actually the work of participating in the Jesus movement, which seeks to realize God's dream and seeks to accomplish God's mission in this world." 

When a body has exhausted all the new relevancies, it will try to resurrect some of the old ones.

Yet there are stirrings that suggest a change is coming. There is hope! Pray that the bishops repent of their pride and ambition. Pray that they stop promoting a false gospel that "love" covers a multitude of sins. Pray that the Holy Spirit will convict, renew, heal, and direct a new generation of faithful Episcopalians who are done with false Utopian promises.