Alice C. Linsley
Sayers draws on her extensive knowledge of the medieval period to help us understand which tools are essential if students are to be life-long learners. She lays the groundwork by asking her audience to consider some “disquieting thoughts” about the direction of English society in the mid-twentieth century and identifies the following concerns:
Irresponsible prolongation of intellectual childhood to justify teaching less in more subjects.
Confusion of fact and opinion, or the proven and the plausible, in the media.
Sophistry in public debate, rather than logical rhetoric. Committees addressing mostly irrelevant matters expected to form public policy.
Failure to define terms and intentional abuse of language, making words mean whatever one wants them to mean. We have a society of adults who don’t know how to discern legitimate expertise from popular pulp and who can’t use the library.
The tendency of some people to become so specialized that they cannot make connections between the disciplines.
Scientists who fail to adhere to the basic principles of Aristotelian logic, thus presenting speculation as facts.
Sayers’ critique of the society in which she lived is relevant today, as these problems have become more pronounced in our time. In 35 years of teaching, I’ve seen the materialistic worldview of empiricism come to dominate public education and inch by inch erode the more balanced offering of private schools, parochial schools and even Christian schools. Once metaphysics is excised from education, we are left with a mechanistic, materialistic, and blatantly false view of reality. And then we wonder why our students are not learning. Or why they seem unmotivated.
What does Dorothy Sayers suggest we do? She suggests restoration of the two-part syllabus of the Trivium and the Quadrivium, which together provide “one coherent scheme of mental training.” Sayers illustrates how modern intellectuals misrepresent medieval metaphysical education by pointing to how one such intellectual confuses location and extension, something that a classically trained high school sophomore would hardly stumble over, having learned the principles of Aristotelian logic.
Read Sayers' "Lost Tools of Learning" here.
Sayers’ critique of the society in which she lived is relevant today, as these problems have become more pronounced in our time. In 35 years of teaching, I’ve seen the materialistic worldview of empiricism come to dominate public education and inch by inch erode the more balanced offering of private schools, parochial schools and even Christian schools. Once metaphysics is excised from education, we are left with a mechanistic, materialistic, and blatantly false view of reality. And then we wonder why our students are not learning. Or why they seem unmotivated.
What does Dorothy Sayers suggest we do? She suggests restoration of the two-part syllabus of the Trivium and the Quadrivium, which together provide “one coherent scheme of mental training.” Sayers illustrates how modern intellectuals misrepresent medieval metaphysical education by pointing to how one such intellectual confuses location and extension, something that a classically trained high school sophomore would hardly stumble over, having learned the principles of Aristotelian logic.
Read Sayers' "Lost Tools of Learning" here.
Related reading: Philosophers' Corner: Grounding Education in the Classical Approach
No comments:
Post a Comment